Coronavirus: Hong Kong protest organisers vow to defy police warning to cancel Labour Day event because of social-distancing rules
Organisers
of a major Labour Day protest in Hong Kong have vowed to press ahead
with their march in defiance of a police warning to cancel it because of
the coronavirus epidemic.
Bosses
at the Confederation of Trade Unions (CTU) insisted the May 1
demonstration could go ahead without breaking the social-distancing laws
in place to stop Covid-19’s spread as they called the force’s ban
threat “absurd”.
A
senior police source said they had asked both the pro-democracy CTU and
the pro-Beijing Federation of Trade Unions to withdraw their protest
applications, warning they ran the risk of holding illegal events if
they took to the streets regardless.
The
source said they would also seek legal advice on how to handle possible
bids for the June 4 vigil in Victoria Park to mark the anniversary of
the Tiananmen Square crackdown in 1989.
How Hong Kong and South Korea manage to keep Covid-19 at bay without enforcing lockdowns
The
social-distancing rules, which were introduced in late March and now
run until at least May 7, include banning public gatherings of more than
four people and shutting 11 types of social and entertainment venues
such as bars, beauty salons, karaoke bars and fitness centres.
Traditionally,
unions and activists from both rival political camps stage rallies on
Labour Day to fight for improvements to workers’ rights.
Referring
to the CTU and FTU bids to take to the streets on May 1, a police
source said: “We have contacted these groups and asked them to withdraw
the applications amid the pandemic.
“If
they don’t, we will object to their applications next week given the
social-distancing regulations. If they insist on taking to the street,
they will be responsible for an illegal assembly and violating the new
regulations.”
FTU
legislator Luk Chung-hung said they had earlier this week decided to
drop plans for the Labour Day march because of the epidemic.
The
source said they had so far received no applications for the June 4
vigil in Victoria Park. But the force would seek advice from the
Department of Justice to see if there were legal grounds for banning any
public assembly even if the social-distancing regulations had already
expired.
“We
need to clarify if the term ‘public safety’ under the Public Order
Ordinance also includes public health amid the pandemic,” he said.
Lee
Cheuk-yan, general secretary of the confederation, said: “It is absurd
that police want to ban our rally even if we can make arrangements to
satisfy the social-gathering restrictions. We can ask people to march in
groups of four, with each [group] keeping 1.5 metres (4.9 feet) away.
“Labour
Day is on May 1 and we are not going to delay the Labour Day march to
after May 7 when the social-gathering rules have expired. Something will
definitely take place on May 1.”
The
organiser of the biggest anti-government demonstrations in Hong Kong,
the Civil Human Rights Front, revealed earlier in the week it had
applied for its annual July 1 march to mark the city’s 1997 handover to
Beijing.
The
police source said they would not process the application until nearer
the time and its handling would depend on the development of the
pandemic.
Figo Chan Ho-wun, vice-convenor of the front, accused police of trying to abuse their power.
“The
Public Order Ordinance does not authorise the police to ban a public
rally on health grounds. The Basic Law promises Hong Kong people the
freedoms of assembly, of procession and of demonstration. A health
regulation cannot override the mini-constitution,” he said.
Under
the ordinance, the police commissioner may ban any public meeting if he
deems “such prohibition to be necessary in the interests of national
security or public safety, public order or the protection of the rights
and freedoms of others”.
Chan
added: “The police role should be to discuss with us and facilitate
public assemblies and processions, say, how a rally can proceed despite
the social restrictions, but not asking us to cancel it.”
Richard
Tsoi Yiu-cheong, of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic
Democratic Movements of China, which organises the annual June 4 vigil,
said its plan was to hold it as usual. “I hope the police will not use
the coronavirus epidemic as an excuse to ban us.”
Tsoi said the alliance would consider filing an application to police around mid-May.
Comments
Post a Comment